Late December is the time of year when it seems the local media shifts its focus a bit. There are fewer tales of tragedy on the evening news, or in the local newspaper, and a few more tales of hope. The only question for senior living marketers is what you’re doing to be part of the holiday headlines.

If it’s been awhile since you’ve seen your community featured prominently in print or on the local television news, it’s time to look aroound for the seasonal story that makes you stand out. Here are some suggestions to help point you in the right direction:

  1. Does your community collectively donate to a soup kitchen or charity? What’s unique about the way your residents are pitching in this holiday season?
  2. Do any of your residents do anything special on their own time for charity? Any shopping mall Santa Clauses?
  3. Ask around. Not everyone who helps the needy likes to talk about it. Find out from residents if there’s someone who’s doing something spectacular, but might be too humble to share.
  4. Who are the staff members doing unique things this holiday season? Is anyone involved in donating their time to a charity? Is there anyone on staff from another nation who has a unique cultural holiday tradition they brought with them? Try to find those uncommon stories.
  5. Look for the back story. Is there a worthy cause that a resident or staff member is passionate about because of a personal experience, such as the loss of the loved one or the kindness of a stranger?

Once you’ve begun to identify these opportunities, local or regional media outreach is a good place to start. Be sure, however, not to stop there. Use the social media channels at your disposal, as well. Tell those heartwarming stories and ask others to share.

It’s also important to think visually. Do you have a lights display outside of your community? What about an intergenerational story involving kids singing carols to some of your residents? What’s happening this time of year that would look great on video?

Generosity breeds generosity. That’s why sharing your community’s charitable endeavors isn’t just good for promoting who you are. If you’ve got a resident who’s hesitating about having their story shared, remind them that positive news can often lead to more positive news, as inspired viewers begin to find their own ways of making a difference.

The media, with or without your contributions, will run holiday-related, heartstrings-tugging stories in the coming weeks. Making sure yours is one of them could feel like an early holiday gift, wrapped up neatly under the tree.

 

This article by Jeff Bell was reprinted with permission from GlynnDevins.

 

A late 2015 Holleran Insight Poll of aging services providers revealed:

  • The age group of employees most engaged within the organization is 46 – 64 (57%); the next most engaged age group is 30 – 45 (36%).
  • The age group of employees least engaged within the organization is 18 – 29 (57%); the next least engaged age group is under 18 (26%).
  • When asked how well their organization would fare if challenged on its tax exemption, 69% said they would keep their tax exemption and 31% said they were not sure. None of the respondents said their organization would lose its tax exemption.
  • When asked if they have a community service plan that defines the community served and identified unmet needs, 47% said yes, 33% said no, and 20% said they were unsure.
  • When asked if they have a process for reporting social accountability activities that includes quantifying their organization’s community engagement, 60% said yes, 27% said no, and 13% were unsure.

 

See the complete survey results and graphs.

HJ Sims recently completed $42.5 million of direct bank financing (with 2 banks) to fund a multi-phase campus growth plan and refinance outstanding debt for Cross Keys Village, a Pennsylvania CCRC.

 

Background

 

Cross Keys Village (“Cross Keys”) is a not-for-profit continuing care retirement community providing residential, health care and other supportive services to seniors in South Central Pennsylvania. It is located on approximately 250 acres in New Oxford, Pennsylvania. Cross Keys is the ninth largest single-site, not-for-profit CCRC in the U.S. and currently consists of 444 independent living units (apartments, cottages and country homes), 91 personal care units and 270 skilled nursing beds. Cross Keys was founded in 1908 and is affiliated with the Southern District of the Pennsylvania Church of the Brethren.

 

It is currently rated “A-” by Standard & Poor’s. In 2014, Sims completed a $10 million Line of Credit bridge financing for Cross Keys Village, enabling commencement of the first phase of the campus expansion/renovation project.

 

Challenge

Coming out of an extensive master planning process, Cross Keys identified a range of capital investment needs and opportunities across its continuum. Working with its project planning team, including SFCS, Greenbrier Development and Sims, Cross Keys ultimately decided to undertake a significant renewal of its health center facilities, particularly in skilled nursing, add capacity in personal care memory support (32 beds), and to build 50 new cottages (the “Project”). The Project consisted of multiple components to be undertaken on a phased basis over a multi-year period – this included three sub-phases of independent living units requiring advance pre-sales.

 

Additionally, Cross Keys had approximately $32.7 million of outstanding LOC-backed variable rate demand bonds (2007 Debt) with the letter of credit renewal slated for November 2015, accompanied by an existing long-dated variable-to-fixed interest rate swap.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2014, Sims assisted Cross Keys in obtaining a $10 million Line of Credit with its existing bank in order to begin the Project with an initial phase of independent living units. Cross Keys sought to begin construction before year-end 2014, so the access to this interim financing was time sensitive. This financing was intended to be a bridge to permanent financing, specifically anticipated to be refinanced as part of a broader Project financing and refinancing in the fourth quarter of 2015.

 

For the proposed permanent financing to be undertaken in 2015, both bond and bank financing options were evaluated. Given Cross Keys’ strong credit profile and comfort with the use of variable/adjustable interest rates and credit renewal requirements, it opted to use bank financing for all of its new capital needs along with the refinancing. Given the size of the capital need and competitive bank financing landscape, with Sims’ leadership, Cross Keys undertook an extensive bank solicitation process with the objective of achieving the most favorable financing outcome for its full capital needs.

 

Cost of capital, Interest rate mix (and risk exposure), and financial capacity and flexibility for possible future capital needs were among the top factors analyzed when determining the plan of financing. Cross Keys ultimately elected to refinance its 2007 Debt with financing from its existing bank and finance the new capital needs with a new bank partner using a combination of two direct bank loans on both bank qualified and non-bank qualified bases. This two bank structure enabled Cross Keys Village to most favorably address the factors noted above and achieve it desired financing outcome.

 

Execution

 

Multiple structuring options were considered including: i) the desired combination of fixed rate and variable rate long term debt (and related interest rate hedging options); ii) the required amount of financing along with structure and timing to achieve lower cost bank qualified financing; and iii) structuring the financing to include two banks and optimize the financing economics and flexibility, while seeking to unify the covenants and other financing terms for the mutual benefit/requirements of Cross Keys along with the two banks.

 

The refinancing of the 2007 Debt was funded by direct bank financing, replacing its LOC and the variable rate demand bonds. The Refinancing followed the same principal maturity/amortization structure as the current debt. Cross Keys Village elected not to modify the amortization, which was “front-loaded” (larger principal repayments in the near-term, followed by declining principal repayment in later years) due to its strong credit profile, including liquidity and cash flow availability, and ability to pay-off the debt quickly, while maintaining strong financial ratios. Further, given Cross Keys’ comfort with its existing 50%/50% variable and fixed rate debt mix and the negative mark-to-market on the existing swap, the swap was maintained and supports the new refinancing debt.

 

The Project financing was ultimately structured as a $9.8 million initial phase of bank qualified financing. Proceeds were used to refinance the 2014 Line of Credit Financing, fund the next phase of project construction draws, including second phase of cottages, the memory support project and additions to selected common areas. Financing for additional capital needs in 2016-2017 (up to $15 million) will occur through additional bank qualified financing provided by the new bank. The use of a three tranche bank qualified structure, with initial financing in 2015, followed by financing in 2016 and 2017, was conceived for the future financings to occur relatively seamlessly with minimal subsequent financing costs. At the end of construction in 2017, Cross Keys Village expects to have approximately $16.2 million of outstanding permanent new capital financing, after entrance fees received are used to pay-down the final tranche of bank debt at the end of construction.

 

Further, after analyzing different interest mode structures, Cross Keys Village elected to have the new capital financing split approximately with 50% as variable rate and 50% as fixed rate (synthetically fixed through a swap), matching the interest rate mix on its 2007 Debt to be retained in the refinancing. The swap was structured as a 2 year forward starting swap (with subsequent 10 year term) allowing Cross Keys to take advantage of low variable interest rates during construction, while locking-in attractive fixed rates following Project completion. This served to reduce the amount of funded interest during construction and lower the total financing cost.

 

Results

 

With the assistance of Sims and the financing working group, Cross Keys was successful in completing the financing in November 2015, as intended. Cross Keys Village achieved its various objectives with a very attractive financing structure for refinancing and new capital, leveraging its credit strength with its existing bank, while adding capacity and a relationship with a new bank.

 

Highlights include: i) having committed funding for the entire campus expansion/renovation project, including current funding now along with future financing instalments for 2016 and 2017; ii) low all-in cost of financing, combining variable rate financing along with fixed rate financing, including retaining its existing swap on the refinancing and added a forward starting swap (2 Years Forward + 10 Year Term) on what will be 50% of permanent new capital financing; iii) utilizing a draw-down feature, along with bank qualified financing, for all new capital needs to reduce the all-in cost of capital; and iv) maintain desired future flexibility for additional capital needs.

 

Sims served as Structuring Agent and Co-Swap Advisor for the financing/refinancing, and this was the sixth financing transaction completed for Cross Keys Village by Jim Bodine over more than 20 years. For more information, please contact Jim Bodine at 215-854-6428 or jbodine@hjsims.com or Mack Welch at 203-418-9024 or mwelch@hjsims.com.

 

This article was reprinted with permission from HJ Sims

Recently, Merrill Lynch, in partnership with Age Wave, released the report Home in Retirement: More Freedom, New Choices, in which they surveyed nearly 3,000 older adults on a range of topics related to homeownership and the choices of where to live in retirement.

 

The report confirmed a number of factors we’ve come to know and understand about the choice of where to live as we age. They found that:

 

  • The # 1 reason for relocating during one’s retirement years, cited by 29% of retirees, was a desire to be closer to family.
  • As we age, our home’s emotional value becomes more important than its financial value.
  • 85% of retirees say that their top preference is to receive long-term care in their home, if needed, rather than in a community environment.

 

This last point led to a portion of the report exploring the topic of home improvements and modifications retirees have made or are considering that would make their homes a more suitable environment in which to live longer. As you’d imagine, technology solutions were cited as being important, and one particular list caught my attention. Not so much because a majority of retirees were interested in technology solutions to support aging in their current residence, but because it was so evident that senior living communities already provide the benefits people are seeking. Perhaps not delivered in the same way, but equally effective.

 

Here are 5 points they highlighted:

 

Consumer Desire #1

80% of retirees are interested in new technologies to reduce their home expenses, such as smart thermostats.

 

Community Benefit

Communities offer all-inclusive monthly fees that are predictable and use the power of volume purchasing to insulate individual residents from spikes in food, energy and transportation costs

 

Consumer Desire #2

76% are interested in technologies to monitor their health at home, such as sensors, alerts or medication reminder apps.

 

Community Benefit

Many communities have on-site clinics or visiting medical practitioners conveniently available to residents, as well as providing wellness services such as flu shots. Plus, having friends and professionals available to help if an emergency happens, essentially eliminates the need for alerts.

 

Consumer Desire #3

67% are interested in home technologies to help them optimize their health, such as devices for air purification or to improve sleep.

 

Community Benefit

From fitness centers, to nutrition and dining, to social opportunities, communities provide residents with a path to maintain and even improve their overall health and well-being.

Consumer Desire #4

64% are interested in home technologies to connect them with family and friends, such as video chat and interactive devices.

 

Community Benefit

Beyond the connections made between residents and staff, many communities are using communication technologies as well as trained staff to support residents in their desire to stay connected.

Community Desire #5

58% are interested in technologies to help them maintain their home, such as cleaning robots or heated driveways.

  

Community Benefit

A move to a community eliminates the need for home upkeep, and the services – such as housekeeping and transportation – make life simpler and more manageable.

 

A person’s desire to remain at home is understandable, and more services in the coming years will join those already promising to make aging in place easier and more manageable.

Clearly though, full-service senior living communities provide much of what consumers say they want. And they provide those benefits not with cold impersonal technology, but with caring, thoughtful people offering the power of human connection, along with the practical benefits of supporting a higher quality of life.

 

This article by Ken Curnes was reprinted with permission from GlynnDevins

In fiscal year 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced several types of “unscheduled” prospective payment system assessments for skilled nursing facilities (SNF), reported BKD. These new assessments were intended to more quickly capture changes in beneficiaries’ therapy services, causing their resource utilization group (RUG)—and the corresponding payment rate—to increase or decrease.

According to a report delivered in 2010, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) noted CMS was paying for therapy services at a higher level than was being provided to the Medicare beneficiary in the SNF. The change of therapy (COT) assessment introduced in FY 2012 specifically instructed the SNF to report any changes in therapy services that would affect reimbursement for Medicare beneficiaries on a weekly basis during their Medicare Part A stay.

In June, the OIG released another study related to how SNFs were conducting the “use” or completion of these other Medicare-required assessments (OMRA). The OIG reviewed billing from FY 2010 through FY 2013 and “found that SNF billing for changes in therapy increased only slightly. In addition, SNFs used assessments very differently when decreasing therapy than when increasing it, costing Medicare $143 million over two years. Further, SNFs frequently used the new start-of-therapy (SOT) assessments incorrectly.”

The OIG recommended to CMS that more effective oversight be implemented to “ensure that Medicare beneficiaries are receiving the proper amount of therapy they need and that Medicare is paying appropriately.” The report further suggested CMS change its payment structure by basing reimbursement on “beneficiary characteristics” rather than the amount of therapy received. 

According to the OIG, until CMS develops this new payment structure, it should do both of the following:

  • Reduce the financial incentive SNFs receive when the level of therapy services change. One suggestion was to eliminate the SNF’s ability to choose a scheduled assessment instead of a combined COT assessment when changing therapy levels.
  • Increase claims review for facilities that use COTs more frequently than others. According to the OIG report, “CMS stated it will work to monitor SNF billing for changes in therapy and to target for education and review claims of SNFs that rarely bill for changes in therapy or that frequently use therapy assessments incorrectly.”

CMS concurred with both recommendations.

This article was reprinted with permission from BKD.

Is your health care organization up to date on the ICD-10 coding manual? A BKD webinar offered a brief tutorial on the manual. The webinar took a look at the steps to find the correct code, common punctuation and instructional tools, differences in code structure and the necessity of reviewing documentation, along with a high-level overview of ICD-10 Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting pertinent to nursing facility post-acute conditions. The webinar reviewed common condition scenarios to gain a baseline understanding of the coding process necessary to assist with transition to the ICD-10 code set, effective October 1, 2015.

 

The webinar covered:

  • How to distinguish between ICD-9 and ICD-10 code structure.
  • How to identify the necessity to review clinical documentation and translate that information into diagnosis code.
  • Best practices related to accurate and specific code assignment.

 

To view the webinar please click here.

 

This article was reprinted with permission from BKD.

Fee-for-service health care has created a culture of competition for hospital discharges among post-acute care providers of all types, according to BKD. As payment systems begin to reward quality and efficiency, post-acute care providers must change their culture to survive. Successful post-acute care providers will be those that differentiate themselves in the context of their work: helping patients transition from an acute care setting to a home or intermediate care setting quickly without bouncing back to acute care.

The problem is that differentiation is complicated by the need to remain fiscally viable under the current payment system, which encourages very different behavior. Identifying partners for the new health care reminds me of the NFL Scouting Combine: You’ll be evaluated on a broad skill set, and it’s important to have the right skills for your position. Here’s a strategy for impressing the scouts.

Patient Flow Is a 40-Yard Dash

Nursing centers must be able to demonstrate and educate potential network partners on programs to keep patient flow moving in the right direction and efficiently—from physician encounter to acute care to post-acute care to home or intermediate care.

 

  • Quality starts at admission – The transition from acute care to post-acute care is the most difficult and risky in a patient’s spell of illness, especially if not done well. Scouts will look for partners with a well-defined admission process, including a fast-track process for patients within that center’s specialty. The admission process will include a “warm handoff,” where caregivers from both the hospital and post-acute care provider discuss the patient’s needs and health information required in the exchange.

 

  • Know when the patient is making a U-turn – A desirable network affiliate will have a program in place to quickly identify changes in a patient’s condition and intervene timely. One such program is Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT), which is publicly available.

 

  • Have the right personnel at the right time – The nursing center must have strong, confidence-inspiring staff present and visible in the center at all times, but especially on Fridays and weekends. Acute care providers are struggling to discharge patients on these days; lack of confidence in weekend nursing center staff often is cited as a frequent cause of acute care re-admissions. 

 

Measuring Patient Care – Both a Vertical & Broad Jump

Acute care scouts are looking for great clinical programs. The fewer post-acute care providers in the network, the more efficiently the network can manage care and measure outcomes. A successful post-acute care provider will have a relatively broad set of effective clinical programs. It’s not that successful nursing centers must be willing and able to take every type of case; rather, by sharing information with acute care providers, they can develop programs around cases frequently seen in their communities. In other words, figure out the right breadth of service based on what the acute care providers and physicians need from you as a provider. The smart money is on programs that are more clinical or medical in nature, not based on rehab.

But it’s not enough to develop those programs. Length of stay (cost) must be balanced with outcomes. So your programs must be broad enough to meet the community’s needs and to provide high-quality, efficient and effective care to patients.

Heavy Lifting – Analyzing the Same Data

Not all nursing centers have systems to capture, integrate and analyze financial and clinical data. A successful partner will have good information about care delivery and the ability to use that information to improve patient care and efficiency as well as demonstrate the existing programs’ performance. To impress the scouts, a nursing center should be able to:

  • Generate significant analysis on individual patients—expected profit or loss at preadmission, actual profit and loss after discharge, progress toward goals and patient retention post skilled discharge.

 

  • Track patients not admitted and the reason; this information will be instructive as you seek to broaden clinical programs.

 

  • Aggregate patient data that tells you, for a particular diagnosis or condition, the revenue and cost of care, length of stay, outcome, type of discharge, etc. This will be crucial in both contracting directly with hospitals and payors—you must know the cost to negotiate contracts—as well as in telling your story under bundled payments for purposes of network building.

 

Preparing for the Draft

Scouts often don’t have the time or expertise to evaluate potential partners on all the key metrics and adequately evaluate them based on the correct metrics. However, by implementing the suggested programs focusing on patient and acute care provider needs (and having the data to back up your story), you’ll be better positioned to land a spot on the team. Here are the steps to take now:

  • Implement a program (INTERACT is a good one) to reduce readmissions—keeping residents after acute care discharge is good for relationships with hospitals and for the bottom line

 

  • Gather information on needed specialties and clinical competencies; discuss with hospital case managers and review publicly available information to identify needed specialties

 

  • Perform a skills inventory of clinical staff to uncover hidden expertise and identify needs matching community needs

 

  • Start gathering data on each admitted patient; it’s a key to effective specialty development and supporting your story for the scouts

 

This article was reprinted with permission from BKD.

 

This article was reprinted with permission from BKD.

With ever-changing billing regulations and increased payor scrutiny, skilled nursing facility (SNF) billing personnel and financial leaders face more challenges than ever, noted BKD. Providers that don’t stay on top of changes affecting billing and accounts receivable (AR) collections risk noncompliance and decreased cash flow.

If you recognize these 5 warning signs that your revenue cycle needs immediate attention, you’ll have a good start toward implementing simple solutions that can get your community back on the right track.

1. Irregular Cash Flow 

 

    The most obvious warning sign that the revenue cycle might be suffering is inconsistent or decreased cash flow. While multiple factors can lead to a change in cash flow, such as a decrease in census or payor-specific system or contract issues, a reduced influx of cash usually can be traced back to the business office.

    Many business office personnel wear several hats, ranging from answering the phone to human resources to accounting duties such as payroll or accounts payable. Often, this means billing and collections functions receive insufficient time to do a thorough job.

    When coupled with inadequate training and technology (more on that in a moment) and sequential billing requirements of many payors—most notably Medicare—outstanding balances can accumulate quickly and create a cash flow crisis.

     

    2. Lack of Defined Revenue Cycle Procedures Where Personnel are Held Accountable for Their Role in the Overall Process

    To improve your overall revenue cycle effectiveness, it’s crucial to realize the revenue cycle begins at admission—or, ideally, prior to admission—and continues through discharge. In addition, it’s important to establish well-defined processes with built-in accountability.

     The admissions staff has a key opportunity to start the revenue cycle process right by gathering accurate information about a potential patient’s payors and available benefits. Compliance and cash flow issues often arise because of failure to gather correct, thorough information upon admission.

     

      For instance, patients enrolled in a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan versus traditional Medicare still will have a Medicare card and may not understand the differences between the two Medicare options. If the admissions representative doesn’t realize the payor actually is an MA plan, the representative is unlikely to obtain the necessary authorizations, causing denial of the claim when it’s discovered the payor was incorrect.

      Business office functions typically are considered the heart of the revenue cycle; this means it’s that much more important for business office personnel to work within defined frameworks, such as private and Medicaid billing completed by the third business day and Medicare claims submitted by the 15th of each month.

      Collections activities also should be scheduled into the monthly calendar, with results being consistently reviewed and evaluated by management, as discussed below.

      Nurses also play a critical role in revenue cycle success, since much of the information on claim forms is clinical in nature, including assessment data and diagnosis codes. For example, inaccurate, late or missed assessments can account for considerable reduction or delay in payments. Because of the integral relationship between clinical and billing, interdisciplinary communication should be a priority for any organization looking to improve revenue cycle results.

      3. Poor Clinical to Billing Communication 

        Since the inception of minimum data set (MDS) 3.0, it’s more important than ever for business office personnel and clinicians to communicate frequently and collaborate in a pre-claims submission review process each month.

        This review process is commonly called a triple check, since it typically includes representatives from nursing, therapy and billing. The purpose of the triple-check process is to confirm information on the UB-04 claim forms against the supporting documentation, which improves the accuracy of claims submitted to the payors.

        A thorough triple-check review should include verifying patient demographic information, ancillary charges and billing and diagnosis codes, among other claim form items. A triple check also should verify required documentation, such as signed physician orders, certification for skilled care and validation reports to confirm assessments were accepted.

        The triple-check meeting should be the final step before any claims are billed—to improve cash flow and compliance as well as provide billing and nursing with peace of mind that what is being billed is accurate and supported by documentation on file.

        4. Inadequate Technical Training & Resources 

          Over the last several years, Medicare—and in many states, Medicaid—billing complexity has increased. Gone are the days of straightforward scheduled assessments and simple Part B claims. The surge in managed care in the long-term care and senior living marketplace has added another level of sophistication.

          With the addition of many types of unscheduled assessments, Part B 59 and KX modifiers and, most recently, G codes (used to report the patients’ functional limitations), the importance of thorough training and reliable resources for business office personnel cannot be overstated.

          Billing for SNFs is unlike billing for any other provider type. All billing is not equal, and expecting someone who has billed for a physician’s office or hospital, for instance, to acclimate to SNF billing with little or no training is unrealistic and will negatively affect compliance and overall revenue cycle health.

          As you look for training options, keep the quality of training in mind. It can be tempting to choose low-cost options such as articles or webinars offered by Medicare Administrator Contractors, but these general resources—while helpful in supplementing knowledge—typically don’t provide the detailed education your business office manager will need to create and submit claims, follow up on claims appropriately and efficiently resolve any technical errors or payor disputes.

          Be willing to seek out and invest in quality training and consulting resources to ensure your billing team has ongoing access to the latest technical information and guidance around best practices.

          As billing has increased in complexity, so has billing software. Many integrated systems are highly customizable, which can be exciting or overwhelming, depending on the skills and knowledge of billing personnel.

          5. Inconsistent AR Oversight 

            If management and billing personnel are not having monthly AR meetings to review outstanding balances, there likely are revenue cycle and cash flow issues. Even for the most seasoned and knowledgeable billing personnel, there are typically a few balances that are difficult to collect. It can be easy to push those challenging accounts to the back burner or give up the collection efforts entirely.

            By contrast, consistent meetings where management reviews the AR aging reports with business office personnel can increase accountability and improve the likelihood of pushing those balances through to resolution. 

            Several important operational improvements can result from these meetings, including:

            • More effective collection efforts.
            • Identification of business office knowledge or training gaps.
            • Management awareness of complicated private-pay collection or specific payor or technology issues that may be better handled by someone on the executive team.

             

            Revenue cycle management isn’t going to get easier. By implementing some relatively simple but highly effective best practices—and ensuring the personnel most directly responsible for cash flow have thorough training and helpful resources—SNFs can thrive despite increased regulatory complexity and oversight.

             

            Are you ready to take off the rose-colored glasses and objectively assess your organization’s financial health? A recent BKD webinar explained how to effectively manage your organization’s revenue cycle performance and abandon common misconceptions. The webinar explained the impacts of a mismanaged revenue cycle and key strategies to help organizations improve their reimbursement and cash flow consistency.

            The webinar covered:

            • Common misconceptions providers have about effectively managing their organization’s revenue cycle performance.
            • The effects of revenue cycle neglect and mismanagement that can result in poor financial health.
            • Key strategies to help improve their organization’s reimbursement and cash flow consistency.

            The webinar is available online.

             

            This article was reprinted with permission from BKD.

            “IRS exams don’t happen terribly often, but when they do, they will change your life,” warned David Trimner, a principal in nonprofit tax with CliftonLarsonAllen, It was just one of the insights, cautions, and lessons captured in the video CLA Talks: IRS Examinations of Nonprofits — War Stories and Lessons Learned.

            In this 7 minute clip, Trimner says there are predictable patterns to IRS exams, and that the IRS tends to look at the same types of issues in all of the examinations it conducts. He elaborates on a few of these risk areas, including:

             

            • Executive compensation.
            • Independent contractors.
            • The distinction between advertising and sponsorship acknowledgements.
            • The tax consequences of affinity contracts.

             

            It should be noted that The Trade Act, passed June 29, 2015, increased the penalties for some issues discussed in this video. It applies to information returns filed after December 31, 2015.

            An IRS examination can drain time and resources, damage morale, and have an adverse effect on the public perception of any organization, Trimner says. He suggests the best way to prepare for an IRS audit is through day-to-day management, governance, and reporting practices.

             

            See the video, made available with permission from CliftonLarsonAllen. 

            Pages

            Subscribe to Corporate Partners