The Veterans Access to Extended Care Act of 2015 (S.739) was introduced in the U.S. Senate on March 16 by Sen. John Hoeven (R-ND) and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), and was then referred to the Committee on Veterans Affairs.

The legislation would move forward on the changes that were in the Veterans Administration proposed rule on provider agreements

In the U.S. House of Representatives, Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-IN) and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) introduced a companion bill, H.R.1369, Veterans Access to Extended Care Act of 2015, which was referred to the Subcommittee on Health. 

On April 23, Rep. Dan Benishek (R-MI), chair of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs Subcommittee on Health, and Ranking Member Rep. Julia Brownley (D-CA) held a hearing to discuss legislation including H.R. 1369.

In the hearing, Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-IN) explained that there is a need to finalize the VA proposed rule on provider agreements in order to improve access to long-term care services for Veterans. 

In his testimony, Adrian Atizado, assistant national legislative director for the Disabled American Veterans, said that "thousands of severely disabled veterans receive services in places other than extended care facilities, such as in their home and community or in an institutional setting at the VA's expense through the use of provider agreements. 

"For example, Atizado continued, "if the measure as currently written were enacted, it would not address concerns in the VA's Veteran's Directed Home and Community-Based Services program currently operating in 47 VA Medical Centers in 27 states and the District of Columbia." 

Mr. Atizado noted that without additional language to address this concern, the VA's Veteran's Directed Home and Community-Based Services program may be terminated in other states. 

Over 400 veterans would be forced out of this program. 

He said that in the most recent VA budget request, the VA is proposing updating its authority, used for purchasing medical care. 

The VA is saying that their proposed language will streamline the business process for purchasing care for veterans when necessary care cannot be purchased through existing contracts or sharing agreements. 

H.R.1369, Veterans Access to Extended Care Act of 2015 would modify the treatment of U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) agreements with service providers to furnish veterans with nursing home care, adult day health care, or other extended care services.

H.R.1369, Veterans Access to Extended Care Act of 2015 delineates that any such agreement shall: 

  • Not be treated as a federal contract for the acquisition of goods or services and shall be not subject to any provision of law governing federal contracts for the acquisition of goods or services. 
  • Include specified requirements (such as for medical licensing and VA review of staff and facilities) to ensure the safety and quality of care furnished to veterans pursuant to such agreement.

Such agreements would be exempted from the application of certain reporting requirements under the Service Contract Act. This legislation may improve the access to adult day services and nursing homes  for Veterans. This legislation would not apply to services not covered by Medicaid in a state.  

Robert McDonald, secretary of Veterans Affairs, has stressed the importance of moving forward with provider agreements.    

On April 16, President Obama signed the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (H.R. 2). The U.S. Senate had voted 92-8 to approve, followed by the U.S. House of Representatives approving the bill 392-37. 

The measure -- also called the "doc fix" -- is a permanent reform of the badly flawed Medicare physician payment system that has been in place since 1997.

LeadingAge members and advocates played a critical role in pushing the “doc fix” bill over the finish line. From meeting with 270 congressional offices during our PEAK Leadership Summit last month to sending more than 2,000 letters to Capitol Hill, LeadingAge members sent a clear message to lawmakers: Take the “doc fix” bull by the horns, and permanently solve the problem in a bipartisan way.

On April 21, the White House invited LeadingAge CEO Larry Minnix to a bipartisan reception to honor all those who worked to get the legislation passed. You can see some of Larry's photos on our Facebook page.

How H.R. 2 Affects You

First of all, part of our Medicare reimbursement is tied to the physician payment formula. Since 2002, we have faced the annual prospect of increasingly large cuts in this reimbursement, which have only been averted by temporary “doc fixes.”

There have been 17 of these temporary measures so far; H.R. 2 will make future ones unnecessary.

In addition, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office “scores” reform of the physician payment formula as a significant cost to the Medicare program and the federal budget in general.

Sponsors of reform legislation therefore have had to come up with significant cuts elsewhere in the Medicare program to offset the cost of the payment reform.

Because the post-acute care sector has already taken several cuts in Medicare payments, we have advocated strongly against further cuts in our reimbursement as an offset for a permanent doc fix.

We have argued against post-acute care payment cuts both in our direct advocacy on Capitol Hill and in the grassroots messages our members have given their legislators.

Our voices have been heard.

The bill the House and Senate voted on and passed provides a 1% payment update in 2018 for post-acute care providers.

Although this percentage may turn out to be somewhat smaller than the market basket increase the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services might have computed and our payments still will be subject to sequestration, this is a 1-time, 1-year provision, not the ongoing, cumulative and larger payment reductions we had anticipated.

Considering the reimbursement cuts with which we previously were threatened, we consider this provision to be good news for our sector.

Medicare Therapy Caps

The doc fix legislation extends the current Medicare therapy caps exceptions process for another two years, through December 31, 2017. We will continue to work with Congress on a bipartisan basis to resolve this issue.

Medicare Home Health Rural Add-On 

Section 210 of H.R. 2 extends a 3% add-on to payments made for home health services provided in rural areas through January 1, 2018. 

This provision will be especially important to LeadingAge home health care provider members in rural areas of Iowa, South Dakota, Montana, Nebraska and Kansas.

There was opposition to H.R. 2 in both houses because it does not completely offset the cost of permanent physician payment reform.

The Medicare Adult Day Services Act of 2015 (H.R. 1383) was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA) on March 16.

The measure, which LeadingAge strongly supports, was referred to both the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee and the Energy and Commerce Committee for consideration. 

If passed, the legislation would:  

  • Expand Medicare beneficiaries care options by adding skilled nursing, rehabilitation and social services in a Medicare Certified Adult Day Services Center. 

     
  • Allow patients who qualify for home health services or nursing homes under Medicare to use a Medicare Certified adult day services center as an option for care. It does not expand eligibility. It simply allows qualified patients to choose a Medicare Certified Adult Day Services Center.

     
  • Save Medicare dollars, cover more services. 

     
  • Not expand the number of people using Medicare services. Eligibility to use the services in a Medicare Certified Adult Day Services Center is the same as the eligibility criteria for Medicare certified home health.

     
  • Require Medicare Certified Adult Day Services Center to meet the standards of nationally recognized accrediting agencies. 

     
  • Require Medicare Certified Adult Day Services Center to comply with all applicable State and local building and fire codes. 

     
  • Ensure that Medicare and Medicaid integrity is maintained with high standards to prevent fraud and abuse. 

     
  • Require Medicare Certified Adult Day Services Center services to be ordered by a physician who approves the plan of care.

Adult day health programs are already providing skilled care through Medicaid and Medicaid waivers. The diversity of services provided in adult day centers are critical for frail older adults and persons with disabilities to obtain the holistic, person-centered services that meet their individual care needs. 

The legislation also recognizes the importance of adult day services as a means of reducing the stress on caregivers.

Please contact your members of the U.S. House of Representatives and ask them to co-sponsor this legislation.

The bill currently has 11 co-sponsors: 

  • Reps. Grace Meng (D-NY).
  • Matt Cartwright (D-PA).
  • Lois Frankel (D-FL). 
  • Alan Lowenthal (D-CA).
  • Steve Cohen (D-TN).
  • Michele Lujan Grisham (D-NM).
  • Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA).
  • John Conyers (D-MI).
  • Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC).
  • Janice Schakowsky (D-IL).
  • Yvette Clarke (D-NY). 

 

Greetings from the southern annex of the North Pole. We are arranging for the weather to warm up for your arrival here a week or so from now. No cherry blossoms, though – they won’t be out until the middle of April, according to the Park Service. 

There will be lots of policy updates during your various meetings at PEAK. Just want to mention a couple of things:

Doc fix: The leaders of the committees with jurisdiction over Medicare have admitted that they are not in a position to put forward a permanent Medicare doc fix before the present patch on the physician payment update formula expires on March 31.

We have heard that a new temporary fix probably will pass before then and will last for a period of somewhere between 3 – 6 months.

We continue advocating for an extension of the therapy caps exceptions process to be part of the doc fix and also for post-acute care not to be a pay-for. We’ve already taken hits to our annual payment update, an across-the-board cut in reimbursement to SNFs, rebasing of home health, 2% sequestration, value-based purchasing and IMPACT.

Housing funding: the House and Senate Appropriations Committees are holding hearings on funding levels for federal programs in 2016. We are urging legislators to accept the Obama Administration’s proposal for $455 million for senior housing.

Both of these issues will be active when LeadingAge members take to the Hill on March 17, so the visits are most timely.

Looking forward to seeing most of you next weekend. Stay warm. 

On Feb. 26, Kathy Greenlee, administrator of the Administration for Community Living, testified to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services,Education, and Related Agencies hearing on the president's FY 2016 budget. 

She made the case for improved funding for Older Americans Act programs, such as congregate meals, meals on wheels, adult day services, transportation and programs that combat elder abuse.

Greenlee stated the importance of the Older Americans Act and Developmental Disabilities Act Programs.  

"By 2020, there will be more than 77 million people over the age of 60, and as many as 2/3 of them will at some point need assistance with dressing, showering, or similar tasks," Greenlee said. "In addition, nearly 57 million people live with disabilities in non-institutional settings, and about 20% of them need assistance with daily living tasks." 

She gave the example, that the the $42.8 million increase for senior nutrition programs in the president's budget, together with state and local funding, will help provide 213 million meals to over 2 million older adults and help halt recent declines in services. 

The Administration for Community Living (ACL) also is requesting an additional $38.5 million to help states provide over 28 million hours of support to older adults needing assistance with daily activities; more than 23 million rides to doctors, pharmacies, grocery stores and other critical activities; and nearly 8 million hours of adult day services. 

ACL will invest an additional $13.9 million in Aging and Disability Resource Centers, which work with states to develop better systems of information; provide one-on-one, person-centered counseling; and streamline access to resources. 

Greenlee noted that the current funding, because of inflation, forces many Area Agencies on Aging to serve fewer congregate and home-bound meals. 

Rep. Cole, the chair of the committee, praised the work of the Administration for Community Living.  

Rep. Rose DeLauro, ranking member of the committee, thanked the Greenlee for her work on elder abuse. Rep. Delauro cares for her 101 year old mother in her home, and she emphasized the importance of having a well trained home care work force. 

Rep. DeLauro is concerned about senior nutrition, noting that there has been a decline in these services due to the budget cuts over the years. 

Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard said she has concerns over the stress on family caregivers. 

Greenlee said she shares her concern, and pointed out that it is a priority for ACL. She mentioned that adult day services have been especially useful in helping family caregiver who work and need a full day of services for their loved ones. 

We urge LeadingAge members to reach out to their members of Congress to provide adequate funding for these important programs.

Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) has reintroduced the Adult Day Center Enhancement Act (H.R.263). As of February 9, 2015, Rep. Corrine Brown (D-FL) and Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) are co-sponsors.


If passed, the legislation:


 


  • Expand and enhance existing adult day programs for younger people with neurological diseases or conditions, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, or other similar diseases or conditions, to support and improve access to respite services for family caregivers who are taking care of such people, and for other purposes.
  • Initiate a comprehensive survey of current adult day programs that provide care and support to individuals including young adults living with neurological diseases or conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, or any similar disease or condition.
  • Establish within the Administration for Community Living a competitive grant program for awarding grants annually to eligible entities, based on the best practices developed under subsection (a), to fund adult day programs serving younger people with neurological diseases or conditions.

 


 


LeadingAge Supports H.R. 263


 


LeadingAge supports this legislation, although it will be difficult to pass H.R. 263 in this congress because of the concern over the cost of implementing these models. 


LeadingAge has adult day members that specialize in caring for individuals with Multiple Sclerosis and other nuerological diseases. These types of disease- specific Adult Day Centers have been very effective with improving care outcomes.  


Previous research on the care of individuals with MS in an adult day services program showed promising outcomes. 


Over 400,000 people are estimated to be living with multiple sclerosis, nearly 1 million people live with Parkinson’s disease, and about 1.4 million people suffer traumatic brain injuries every year. 


Typically, people suffering from these neurological diseases or conditions require support from family caregivers to carry out the activities of daily living. Adult day programs can offer a range of services to assist individuals with disabilities -- including medical care, rehabilitation therapies, nutrition therapy, social interaction and transportation.   


 

On June 5, the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee approved a fiscal 2015 appropriations bill combining funding for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with a few other federal agencies. 

The bill provides the same level of funding for Section 202 and Section 8 that the U.S. House of Representatives included in its version of the bill:

  • $420 million for Section 202 housing, a $36.5 million increase over fiscal 2014
  • The Section 202 funding includes $350 million to fully fund all annual project-based rental assistance contract renewals and amendments.
  • $70 million is provided for service coordinators.

No new money was provided for the new housing with supportive services demonstration program. However, the Senate Appropriations Committee included language in its report on the bill allowing HUD to use remaining 2014 funds, residual receipts, collections and unobligated balances to keep the demonstration program moving forward. 

This language was more favorable to the demonstration program than the language of the U.S. House of Representatives' version of the spending bill.

Larry Minnix sent the following message to every senator in support of the language in the Senate Appropriations Committee's report:

On
behalf of LeadingAge’s 6000 not-for-profit aging services providers and the 4.5
million persons we serve, I am writing to urge you to support the Section 202
demonstration project as reported out in the Senate THUD bill and to reject the
restrictive language in the House bill.

The
senior homeless population will increase by 33 percent by 2020 and more than
double by 2050 according to the National Alliance to End Homelessness. Our
members with Section 202 and 236 properties have tens of thousands of people on
their waiting lists who desperately need affordable, supportive housing. The
Section 202 rental assistance demonstration authorized in FY14 is a critical
step towards meeting our growing demographic needs by creating a
"demonstration program to test housing with services models for the
elderly that demonstrate the potential to delay or avoid the need for nursing
home care." LeadingAge has worked closely with HUD and non-profit
developers on this demonstration.

While
the House's FY15 THUD bill seeks to severely restrict the demonstration, the
Senate bill expressly urges maximum flexibility to test a new, workable model
of supportive housing in a close partnership with the states. I am writing to
urge you to maintain this flexibility in the final Senate bill and throughout the
conference process with the House bill.

It
is essential that Congress support HUD’s efforts implementing the Section 202
demonstration, which can provide a path toward serving the housing and health
care needs of low-income seniors in ways that improve health outcomes, lower
costs, and support the preferences of the aging population. Our members have
significant anecdotal evidence that stable, quality housing, when coupled with
appropriate services, can delay or obviate the need for more expensive assisted
living or licensed nursing care. This demonstration will test models for
expanding capacity to meet our growing demands in the most cost-effective way.

A study just released byASPE supports the underlying need for this demonstration. LeadingAge’s
research institute participated in this study which found that older adults
enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid and receiving HUD-assistance in 12
jurisdictions: 

  • Have more chronic
    conditions than their peers in the community who do not receive HUD assistance.
     
  • Utilize more
    health care, including hospitals and emergency department services, than their
    peers in the community who do not receive HUD assistance.  
  • Have higher
    health care costs than the average older person—and even higher costs than
    community-dwelling elders not receiving HUD assistance who are also eligible
    for both Medicare and Medicaid. 
  • The data from this study
    suggests just how much potential housing providers have to help low-income
    residents manage their health and improve their functional status—all while
    saving health care dollars. 

Thank you for your
leadership and support in serving America's low-income seniors.

Sincerely, 

William L. Minnix, Jr.

President and CEO, LeadingAge

 

Pages

Subscribe to Legislation