Aging services providers have more technology options than ever, but choosing the right tool is only part of the challenge. The bigger question is whether organizations have the culture, training, and discipline to use technology in ways that truly support older adults, staff, and families.
That question stayed with me after I was a guest at a Technology First Foundation session with SHIFT, a leader in advancing Technology First standards and best practices across long-term services and supports. SHIFT describes Technology First as intentionally considering technology as a primary support option, rather than automatically defaulting to traditional in-person supports. Simply put, technology should not begin with the device, platform, or vendor pitch but with the person. SHIFT promotes its vision by providing comprehensive education, professional certifications, organizational accreditation, and practical tools and resources.
The person-centered distinction matters for aging services. Many older adults want what all of us want: to make their own choices, stay connected to the people and routines that matter to them, remain in their homes or communities when possible, and receive support without feeling overmanaged.
Technology can help make that vision possible, but only when it is introduced thoughtfully. A medication dispenser, smart stove, wearable device, voice assistant, remote support model, or communication tool is not automatically person-centered. It becomes person-centered when it helps someone do more for themselves, make more of their own decisions, or participate more fully in daily life.
One of the ideas from the session that stood out to me was the importance of moving from a “caretaker” mindset to a “coach” mindset. In aging services, care and support are essential, but well-intentioned support can sometimes become over-support. Staff, family members, and organizations may step in quickly because they are trying to protect someone, make life easier, or avoid risk. But when we do too much for someone, we may unintentionally reduce their independence, privacy, confidence, and opportunity to make choices. This is where the Technology First mindset is useful. For aging services providers, rather than ask, “What technology should we buy?,” the better question is, “What is this person trying to do, and could technology help them do more of it on their own terms?”
The examples discussed in the session were practical and familiar. A medication dispenser can help someone manage medications more independently, but only if it is easy enough for the person, family, or staff to set up and use. A smart stove can help reduce kitchen-related risks while allowing someone to continue cooking. Wearables and sensors can help identify changes in activity or potential emergencies, but they also raise important questions about consent, privacy, and who receives the information. Remote support can provide reassurance when an older adult is alone, but it should be designed as aid, not supervision.
The session also emphasized a challenge many providers know well: technology abandonment. A device may be purchased, installed, and even celebrated, only to end up unused because it was too complicated, poorly matched to the person, not supported by staff, or introduced without enough training. That is not just a loss of money. It can also create frustration, reduce trust, and discourage the older adult from trying another technology later. Providers should prioritize assessment, training, and follow-through as central to successful technology adoption.
For aging services, the Technology First movement offers a timely lesson. Technology First, done well, is not about replacing staff. It is about helping older adults receive the right support, at the right time, in the least intrusive and most empowering way possible. It is also about helping staff shift their role from doing everything for someone to supporting older adults in doing more for themselves when possible.
Providers interested in this approach may want to explore SHIFT’s Technology First education offerings, including Technology First Foundations and more advanced education for professionals involved in assessment, planning, implementation, and leadership. Even for organizations that are early in their technology journey, SHIFT’s work offers a useful way to think about how technology can be integrated into services in a way that is practical, ethical, and deeply person-centered.